Most AI features bleed money because teams measure success by usage metrics instead of unit economics. A customer support chatbot with 10,000 daily conversations looks successful—until you realize each $0.15 API call is subsidized by a $0.50 customer acquisition cost. This guide provides the frameworks to calculate true profitability per user and avoid the “successful failure” trap.
Traditional SaaS unit economics focus on Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) and Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC). AI features add a third dimension: Cost Per Inference (CPI). This creates a dynamic where your most engaged users—those generating the most value—are simultaneously your highest-cost customers.
Consider this scenario: A coding assistant charges $20/month per user. Power users generate 500 inferences daily. At GPT-4o pricing ($5 input/$15 output per 1M tokens), with average 2,000 token inputs and 500 token outputs, that’s:
Input: 500 × 2,000 = 1,000,000 tokens = $5.00
Output: 500 × 500 = 250,000 tokens = $3.75
Daily cost: $8.75 (262.50/month)
Monthly loss: $242.50 per power user
Without unit economics tracking, you’d celebrate the engagement while burning $242.50 per customer.
Unit economics transform AI feature management from guesswork into financial engineering. When you can calculate margin per inference, you gain three critical levers:
Pricing Precision: Instead of flat-rate subscriptions, you can implement usage-based pricing that preserves margins. A user generating 100 inferences might pay $5 while a user generating 1,000 pays $45—both profitable.
Feature Optimization: If your coding assistant’s “explain code” feature costs $0.12 per call but your “generate test” feature costs $0.45, you can prioritize the former or re-engineer the latter with smaller models.
Customer Segmentation: Identify which user cohorts subsidize others. Your “power users” might be 10% of customers but consume 80% of inference costs—requiring either price increases or feature limits.
Without unit economics, you’re flying blind. With them, every product decision becomes a profitability calculation.
Many models charge for cached input tokens at reduced rates, but developers forget to implement caching. Fix: Always check if your model offers prompt caching and implement it aggressively.
Your $0.15 API call might actually cost $0.18 after adding load balancers, monitoring, and API gateway fees. Fix: Add a 15-20% overhead multiplier to all inference costs.
Unit economics dashboard template + ROI calculator
Interactive widget derived from “Unit Economics for AI Features: Calculating Profitability Per User” that lets readers explore unit economics dashboard template + roi calculator.
Unit economics transform AI feature development from a guessing game into a financial discipline. By systematically tracking Cost Per Inference (CPI) against ARPU, you can identify which features, user segments, and model choices drive profitability versus losses. The frameworks provided—profitability equation, break-even analysis, and cohort tracking—enable you to:
Detect hidden losses before they scale (like the $242.50/month power user example)
Optimize pricing based on actual consumption patterns
Select models appropriately for each feature’s complexity
Segment users to prevent free tiers from destroying margins
The verified pricing data shows that model selection critically impacts unit economics: using gpt-4o-mini ($0.15/$0.60) instead of gpt-4o ($5/$15) for simple tasks can reduce costs by 30x. Implement the instrumentation, build your cost database, and calculate margins weekly. Your AI features should generate profit, not just engagement.