A fintech startup projected $15K monthly spend on their AI assistant. Three months later, they were staring at a $127K bill. Their forecasting model failed to account for a 3x growth in user queries during tax season, plus a 40% increase in average response length as users asked more complex questions. This guide provides the forecasting frameworks and capacity planning strategies to prevent that scenario.
Traditional infrastructure scaling follows predictable patterns—CPU usage grows linearly with traffic, storage grows predictably. LLM token burn breaks these rules. Your costs are a function of three independent variables: request volume, average tokens per request, and model selection. Each can spike independently.
Consider these industry observations from production systems:
E-commerce platforms see 4-6x token burn increases during Black Friday/Cyber Monday, not just from traffic but from users asking detailed product comparison questions
SaaS support bots experience 2x context length growth when users paste error logs, screenshots (via vision), and conversation history into single prompts
Financial services face 30-50% retry rate spikes during market volatility as users hammer systems with time-sensitive queries that timeout
The business impact is severe. Without forecasting, you’re flying blind into budget overruns. With forecasting, you can implement preemptive controls: auto-scaling token budgets, dynamic model routing, and capacity reservation strategies.
LLM costs scale non-linearly with growth. A 2x increase in users can trigger a 3-5x cost increase when you factor in context length growth, retry storms, and seasonal spikes. Without forecasting, you’re flying blind into budget overruns. With forecasting, you can implement preemptive controls: auto-scaling token budgets, dynamic model routing, and capacity reservation strategies.
The business impact is severe. Consider that OpenAI’s gpt-4o costs $5.00 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output tokens, while Anthropic’s claude-3-5-sonnet costs $3.00/$15.00 per 1M tokens respectively. When response lengths increase by 40% during seasonal spikes, your output token costs—already 3x higher than input costs—multiply accordingly.
Users don’t just grow—they become more engaged. Active users generate 2-3x more requests than new users, and their context windows expand as they build conversation history.
During peaks, every token matters. Failing to route low-value queries to cheaper models (like gpt-4o-mini at $0.15/$0.60 per 1M tokens) can increase costs by 30-50%.
System prompts and conversation history accumulate. Without pruning, effective token usage can grow 40-80% over 6 months even with constant user behavior.
Seasonal cost forecasting requires modeling three independent variables: request volume, token efficiency, and model selection. The key insight is that LLM costs scale non-linearly—user growth alone doesn’t tell the story. You must account for context creep (40-80% over 6 months), retry storms (15-35% overhead), and seasonal spikes (3-6x traffic).
Actionable framework:
Track daily users, requests per user, and tokens per request separately
Apply seasonal multipliers based on historical patterns
Add 30-50% buffer for context growth and retries
Implement dynamic model routing to cheaper alternatives during peaks
Set circuit breakers at 8x baseline to prevent runaway costs
The difference between a $15K and $127K bill isn’t user growth—it’s failing to model how user behavior changes during peak periods. Start with the three-variable model, validate against actuals weekly, and adjust your multipliers based on production data.